|  | c.1. | MANAGING
            THE NETWORK | 
        
          |  |  | The
            group analyzes and weighs four types of management: | 
        
          |  |  | c.1.1. | Transparent
            network -
            nothing is done, all entries circulate and there is nobody directly
            in charge of the information. | 
        
          |  |  | c.1.2. | Management
            with control of information flow –
            it implies a decision on which information will/will not be allowed
            to enter the network. | 
        
          |  |  | c.1.3. | Management
            with organizational control –
            information is channelled through to the constituencies. | 
        
          |  |  | c.1.4. | Management
            through mobilization of users –
            the manager draws the attention of constituencies on the
            availability of information in the network. | 
        
          |  |  | The
            EMS knowledge network should be managed following the fourth
            modality. | 
        
          |  | d.1. | INSTITUTIONALIZATION
            OF THE NETWORK | 
        
          |  |  | This
            should be part of the discussion relative to the expected impact
            resulting from activities and projects promoted by the network.
            Accordingly, in order to maximize the expected impact the following
            is proposed: | 
        
          |  |  | - | IDRC,
            through the Executive Director of the EMS, assumes the
            responsibility of organizing an EMS program committee integrated by: | 
        
          |  |  |  | * | Group
            of donors so that the EMS knowledge network is accountable to the
            donors; | 
        
          |  |  |  | * | Group
            of associates (partners, constituency); | 
        
          |  |  |  | * | IDRC
            or EMS as network administrator. | 
        
          |  |  | - | The
            working group will move ahead in a joint meeting where the
            donors, the associates and the administration review the ongoing
            program and secure its follow-up and feedback. | 
        
          |  |  | - | The
            donors meet with the administration to review the ongoing
            program ("accountability" of the administration). | 
        
          |  |  | - | IDRC
            will also act as "incubator", towards the
            self-sustainability of the network. The Secretariat will work within
            IDRC as a trust fund managed by a council of trustees. IDRC ensures
            that the Secretariat may receive contributions from bilateral,
            multilateral donors or private philanthropes. This is a permanent
            development process that will take a minimum of 3 years. | 
        
          |  |  | - | IDRC
            may become the moral guarantee of the project and the promoter of
            donations from other donors to the Secretariat (Trust Fund). | 
        
          |  |  | - | IDRC
            meets the conditions and institutional support necessary to promote
            donations also from the private sector. In this way, it may promote
            a change in the traditional lack of confidence between the public
            and private sectors in LAC. | 
        
          |  | e.1. | IMPLEMENTATION | 
        
          |  |  | - | The
            EMS will present a three-year project that will include the
            development of the Secretariat as a knowledge network and will
            incorporate the criteria recommended by the working group on the
            drafting and upgrading of contents. | 
        
          |  |  | - | The
            funding systems suggested may include donations that are either: | 
        
          |  |  |  | * | Bilateral | 
        
          |  |  |  | * | Multilateral | 
        
          |  |  |  | * | Private
            philantropy | 
        
          |  |  | - | It
            must also include a proposal to securing a significant participation
            of local funds. | 
        
          |  |  | - | The
            EMS must move on with the discussions of the Forum by preparing an
            innovative project that combines the efforts of the Forum
            participants and the potential actors invo lved in the use of the
            network. | 
        
          |  |  | - | The
            EMS will act as a spin-off promoting the installation of telematic
            capacity at the level of municipalities and contributing to the
            local government modernization process. | 
        
          |  |  | - | The
            presence and interest of the participating constituency must be
            expressed through their representative bodies, who will endorse the
            project presented by the EMS. For example, The Latin American
            Chapter of the International Union of Local Authorities, The
            Federation of Municipalities of the Central American Isthmus, and
            the MercoCities Network. |